The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on November 4 a plea by Balwant Singh Rajoana, convicted in the 1995 assassination case of the then Punjab chief minister Beant Singh, seeking commutation of his death sentence to life term due to an “inordinate delay” in deciding his mercy petition.
A special bench of Justices B R Gavai, P K Mishra and K V Viswanathan will hear the plea of the former Punjab Police constable.
On September 25, the top court had sought responses from the Centre, the Punjab government and the administration of the union territory of Chandigarh on Rajoana’s plea.
In his plea, Rajoana has sought directions to the Centre and the Punjab government to commute his death sentence “due to inordinate delay” in its execution and in deciding the “mercy petition filed on his behalf”.
Rajoana was convicted in Singh’s assassination case. The former chief minister and 16 others were killed in a blast at the entrance of the civil secretariat in Chandigarh on August 31, 1995.
A special court had sentenced Rajoana to death in July 2007.
Rajoana has said that in March 2012, a mercy petition under Article 72 of the Constitution was moved by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) on his behalf.
On May 3 last year, the apex court had refused to commute his death sentence and said the competent authority could deal with his mercy plea.
In his fresh plea filed in the top court, Rajoana has said he has undergone a total sentence of about 28 years and eight months, of which he served 17 years as a death row convict. It has been over a year since the top court directed the competent authority to decide on his mercy petition, he said.
The plea referred to an April 2023 order of the top court in a separate matter in which it directed all states and appropriate authorities to decide the pending mercy petitions at the earliest and without any inordinate delay.
“Despite the above directions, the mercy petition of the petitioner herein has been kept pending,” the plea stated.
“It is submitted that this extraordinary and inordinate delay in deciding his mercy petition, for reasons beyond the petitioner’s control and not attributable to him, is an infringement of his right to life guaranteed under Article 21,” it said.
According to the plea, the issue of keeping mercy petitions pending for long and the incarceration of the convict has come up for consideration before the apex court in numerous cases.
In one of the cases, the plea said, the top court had directed to commute the death sentence to life imprisonment taking into consideration the delay of over five years in the disposal of mercy petition.
“It is respectfully submitted that an inordinate delay in decision of a death row convict’s mercy petition (as in the present case) has consistently been recognised by this court as a valid enough ground for commutation of his death sentence,” it said.
“The petitioner, a death row convict, has been awaiting a decision on his mercy petition for an inordinately prolonged period, being subjected to unimaginable mental agony on account of uncertainty over the fate of his life for an inordinate and unreasonably prolonged period, which is an assault on his right to life recognised under Article 21,” it said.
Leave a Reply